A Call for Anarchy, Not Patriotism on May 16

The Constitution grants Americans the right to peacefully assemble for the redress of grievances. How long one can remain after a march or protest is not addressed, but usually these events are over in a day.

The forthcoming May 16 Operation American Spring, is a call for a million or more Americans to come to Washington, D.C. for the purpose of staying in the nation’s capital “as long as it takes to see Obama, Biden, Reid, McConnell, Boehner, Pelosi, and Attorney General Holder removed from office” is a call for anarchy.  

Operation American Spring offers the perfect opportunity for elements within the Obama administration to claim the government is under attack even if they were the ones doing an actual armed attack.

Among those million attending would surely be “patriots” who would not heed the organizer’s call to not bear arms and to obey all District laws. The purpose of the event is to remove those it says are “threatening our existence, our freedom, our liberty, our Constitution, our life. When the government becomes lawless, then ‘we the people’ no longer are obligated to follow the government…At this time the government is performing as a lawless entity.”

The federal government is not lawless. Most of us, while unhappy with the gridlock of Congress and the constant stream of lies from the White House, know that it is working for the most part within the constraints of the Constitution. If you want lawlessness, just show up to participate in Operation American Spring.

By contrast, note that there a legal suits in the courts challenging the legitimacy of Obamacare, a tax that was initiated in the Senate when only the House may authorize taxation, and there is congressional action proceeding on both the IRS actions and the deceptions put forth about the Benghazi attack. It’s not as if Congress is not taking action or that the courts are not proceeding to address these issues. They are.

Operation American Spring says its goal “is restoring the U.S. Constitution as the law of the land, removing the lawless leadership.” We have the means to do that. They are called elections and we have an important one in November.  

Why can’t the organizers just wait until then? The answer is that they want the President and Attorney General and others it names removed now.

That’s not how our system works and we should all have real concern when Operation American Spring says “The militias across the United States are responding and mobilizing to the call to protect the Republic.” The problem with this is that a militia is defined as “a group of people who are not part of the armed forces of a country but are trained like soldiers.”

Operation American Spring is led by Col. Harry Riley, U.S. Army (Ret), a man who served 34 years in the military before retiring in 1992. Suffice to say he has had a remarkable career and has been the recipient of many awards including the Silver and Bronze Star. He says that what he is calling for is “civil disobedience” and he cites what occurred in Cairo in 2011 as an example, but those demonstrations were against a despot and resulted in the Egyptian military having to step in to remove duly elected members of the Muslim Brotherhood when their leader attempted to dispense with that nation’s constitution. That doesn’t even begin to describe the state of affairs in America today.

Obama had made it clear he would prefer to rule—not govern—by executive order and regards Congress as a nuisance, but he is not a despot. Not yet.

A massive march and occupation of the nation’s capital offers the perfect opportunity for what is known as a “false flag” event that would empower the President to declare martial law and unleash vast arrests and imprisonments that completely bypass the Bill of Rights.

By definition, a false flag operation is one in which elements within a government stage an attack, pretending to be a targeted enemy and then blaming it on those it seeks to control and subdue. Those would be the “patriots” who show up to achieve Operation American Spring’s goals.

Restoring the Constitution and the rule of law would literally require a second American Revolution and no one wants or needs that.

Washington, D.C. has hosted many major marches over the years. All have been conducted without violence. None have proposed taking over the government. It’s one thing to be unhappy with the President and his administration. It’s quite another to ignore the Constitution in the name of restoring it.

Power and Reason

I’ve been watching something over the last several weeks which I believe serves as an example of what happens when Individuals are given power over others even in what should be considered routine activities.
Recently a concerned Father objected to a reading assignment required of his 14-year-old daughter. This occurred in Gilford, New Hampshire.
The reason this man protested his daughters reading assignment was because he viewed the material to be inappropriate for a fourteen year old to be reading. It was primarily one passage in question.
I’ll let you decide.

“‘Relax,’ Matt murmured, and then he sank his teeth into her shoulder. He pinned her hands over her head and ground his hips against hers. She could feel his erection, hot against her stomach.
” … She couldn’t remember ever feeling so heavy, as if her heart were beating between her legs. She clawed at Matt’s back to bring him closer.
“‘Yeah,’ he groaned, and her pushed her thighs apart. And then suddenly Matt was inside her, pumping so hard that she scooted backward on the carpet, burning the backs of her legs. … (H)e clamped his hand over her mouth and drove harder and harder until Josie felt him come.
“Semen, sticky and hot, pooled on the carpet beneath her.”

(H/T Freedom Outpost)  The actual quote highlights from the book are oddly difficult to find.
Full disclosure… I’ve now read the book and found Jodi Picoult to be a very good and engaging author.  However, I’m old and the above passages are the least offensive things I read on a daily basis watching the dismantling of our Democratic Republic.  At fourteen I would have had a very different reaction.  I’m also fully aware that these types of discussions have been occurring for decades.  A famous example was the introduction of “Go Ask Alice” into reading programs across the country during the 70′s.  There was a cry to ban this book.  But that is not what is happening here even though there is a desperate effort to position it as such.
It’s also important to note that the father, William Bear, only wanted the School Board to provide an “Opt Out” for his and other parents children should they not desire their 12-14 year old children to read such material.
Seems Reasonable…
When Mr. Bear asked the School Board for this provision he was limited to two minutes.  He stayed within his two minutes.
The School Board was then addressed by individuals implying that an “Opt Out” amounted to book burning…
When Mr. Bear spoke out to counter this accusation, as that was not at all what he was asking for, he was “outside” of his two minutes having already used them (this was a brand new rule instituted for this meeting) and Mr. Baer was ARRESTED.
While most of the media who is giving this attention have focused on either “morality” entering schools (We certainly wouldn’t want that) or the mentality of “ownership” of our children by the schools (we certainly wouldn’t want to admit that) they miss an important point.
It doesn’t really matter where this type of event occurs.  It could be this School Board meeting, the Zoning Department or getting your Drivers License renewed at the DMV.  We see Reason removed when it runs counter to those “in charge” who are provided the legal option of Force to remedy conflict.
Since when can a School Board order the arrest of a citizen for whom they work?  They had a number of options, from having a legitimate discussion of the content (which they absolutely refused to do… they wouldn’t read it, they wouldn’t discuss it at this meeting) to adjourning the meeting if they thought it was “out of control”.
Instead they chose Force over Reason.
We are witnessing this dynamic all over the United States.  We have seen a growing acceptance of such behavior over the last several decades.  We are witnessing a lament from those who practice it that those who expose it are destroying media…  and we have witnessed that howl for decades as well.
In the end I’m not one who will tell you this type of thing is new… I will tell you instead that the fractionalization of media has provided us with the opportunity to see it happening where years ago it would have been left unreported.
We are where we are in this country because of the types of people making up a small School Board in New Hampshire.
We are where we are in this country because we have only recently been able to see clearly and undeniably how this behavior manifests itself.
We are here because we were in the dark, and when we did see it in the past we were isolated and marginalized.
That is changing.
These are indeed interesting times.
Regarding the Father and his mission to get attention for an “Opt Out” provision for his and all other families who might desire their children not be FORCEFULLY exposed to inappropriate material… as defined by THE PARENT… I would recommend taking a page out of Saul Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals, a Liberal Manifesto for getting your way.
I suggest allowing his 14-Year Old Daughter to take two minutes before the Gilford School Board and read all of pages 309-310 and 313 out loud for The Board and all those in attendance.  I would also suggest having a separate Camera focused on each School Board member while she honors her required reading assignment.  Finally I, as the Father, would take my 120 seconds, graciously provided by the Benevolent Humans in charge of Education in Gilford, and read the appropriate New Hampshire Child Pornography statues which could be applicable to his daughter having to complete the reading requirement forced upon her.
Of course, Saving the last 5 seconds to again ask for an “Opt Out” Provision… not a book burning.

Just How Drunk Was Obama September 11th, 2012?

That's a fair question, isn't it? I mean, there's no real evidence that Obama was falling down drunk, hugging the porcelain phone and calling Ralph, during those eight hours, but then, there's no real evidence that he wasn't either! Given his proclivities to drugs, maybe he reconstituted the Choom Gang? Did Aunt Zeituni bequeath him the family crack pipe?? Somewhere, there's an explanation for what occupied the Commander-in-Chief from the time he heard our Ambassador was under attack, until he popped into his jammies to rest up for a big day of fundraising in Vegas the next day. Problem is, we've never heard it!

Democrats, known for their lack of partisan posturing (stop laughing!) are telling us that there is no need for another hearing into Benghazi, because there have already been, by their accounting, seven that they've stonewalled, er, participated in!

Democrat Jack and Democrat Jill went up to the Hill,
to fetch a pail of water.
Jack came down with an empty pail, again, and said:
"But I've gone up the Hill seven times now!!!"
Well! That makes all the difference! The problem with the empty bucket headed Democrats, is that there are too many unanswered questions and the questions are by no means new.

As I pointed out in October 29, 2012, the scandal is threefold:

The negligence that preceded the attack.

Who specifically, person or persons, was responsible for the security of the Benghazi compound prior to the attack? Given the known dangers in the region, it is not unreasonable to assume this could reach upwards to the offices of an alert and conscientious Secretary of State or President. How engaged were they in monitoring what was going on in Libya and the region? Secondly, what consequences has that person or persons suffered as a result of this abysmal breach of security? Anyone fired? Demoted? Reassigned??
Make that part of the public record.

(Please don't echo the canard about stingy Republicans and sequestration. The State Dept admitted they had the money and even spent millions for art in foreign embassies. That dog won't hunt!)

The response of the administration as the attack was taking place

Why was no one sent to help Americans, under attack, in threat of their lives? Aside from the lame, "we couldn't get there in time", which presupposes knowledge not present at the beginning of the attack, to whom did Obama gives orders, what specifically were those orders, and if they were not carried out, what were the consequences of disobeying those orders?

This in not, as so many Democrats bleat, a "gotcha" on the President, unless he didn't issue the orders. But he said he did. In an interview, Obama said, and I quote:

"...the minute I found out what was happening, I gave three very clear directives. Number one, make sure that we are securing our personnel and doing whatever we need to. Number two, we're going to investigate exactly what happened so that it doesn't happen again. Number three, find out who did this so we can bring them to justice."

Question: Sir, which minute exactly was that? To whom, specifically, did you give those "very clear directives"?, and what actions precisely were taken as a result of your orders?

For a year and eight months, the President of the United States has been dodging simple questions that he could answer himself, without subpoena or committee or tribunal, about where he was, what he did, or didn't do. We found out this week, through the testimony of former spokesweasel for the National Security Council, Tommy Vietor, that he was in the White House situation room and Barack Obama wasn't. When pressed where Obama was, if not the situation room, Vietor bleated "in the White House".

Please note that Tommy Vietor neither confirmed nor denied that Obama was falling down drunk and throwing up on the Resolute desk, even though we have just as much evidence for this as any vague explanations the White House has given to date. And lastly...

"The bewildering, ham handed attempt to cover up a naked act of terrorism with some fairy tale about an obscure video, and the escalation of a demonstration that never took place."

In the latest batch of emails pried from the grubby mitts of the "most transparent administration in history" (stop laughing!), we see clearer indications that the whole "blame the video" game was a naked political ploy. How anyone, even the slimiest of politicians could stand by those coffins of four Americans being brought home to rest and tell their grieving families the same cockamamie fairy tale about a video, and "getting the guy who made it", is beyond me.

Who is responsible for creating the narrative about a video and gave the talking points to Susan Rice to lie to the nation on five separate Sunday talk shows, when from hour one of day one, the president and his men knew it was a terrorist attack? Why was the charade continued for weeks by everyone including the president? What consequences have taken place to ensure that the American people are not lied to again on this grand a scale?

Democrats like California's Adam Schiff (above) can pretend that a committee finally trying to pry the truth about Benghazi, and its cover up, out of this administration is purely partisan, as if the stonewalling of this administration were not, but that dog isn't going to hunt, either.

Within weeks, hostage survivors of the Algeria oil fields were being interviewed on 60 Minutes. Some thirty survivors of Benghazi are yet to be heard from. If any Democrat can point out to me the public transcripts that contain the answers to my questions are found, or the tesitmony of the Benghazi survivors who were first hand witnesses, I will apologize to Barack Obama and Hillary and kiss the feet of Nancy Pelosi (it sure beats the other end!). But, they can't do it, because this time, we need an honest, genuine investigation, with people under subpoena, to get to the bottom of this, ascertain guilt if applicable and demand accountability.

As Barack Obama would say, "Period."

The Sickness that is Coming

One of the more important epiphanies I had was that age doesn't matter when it comes to leadership and capabilities.  Sure, you would think older people are wiser, but as I've aged I realized that in fact, no, they're just older.  They are just as dumb and incompetent as people half their age.

While it took some daring and bravado to make this epiphany when I was 30, it is only reinforced as it is now my generation that is approaching 40 and will be viewed by today's 20 somethings as the "wise elders who have their act together."  The modern day 20 something does not know what I know and does not see what I see in my 4 decades old peers - that they're the same idiots and morons they were back in the 90's when they were in their 20's.  They did not mature, they just got older, and really have no clue what they're doing.

But if we were to extrapolate this trend, one where generations don't mature, never grow up, and never change, just merely get older, the country is in for a world of hurt.  For while I can't believe people in my generation are heading up companies, working their way up the corporate ladders, or are educators and teachers in our schools, what's coming down the pipe is scary - a mentally infected or diseased generation.

When I say "infected" or "diseased" I mean I look at the kids today, especially of college age, and realize they have a genuine mental condition.  We can all laugh and mock them citing examples of entitlement, weakness, and idiocy, highlighting stories where they demand free education or have their parents attend a job interview with them or Pajama Boy's latest antics, but these are merely the symptoms of a much larger and threatening sickness.  One where nearly an entire generation is incapable of understanding other people's rights, freedom, and property.

If you look at college students and 20 somethings today an unacceptable number of them lack the mental ability to respect the rights and freedoms of others.  There was the student journalist that wanted to ban conservative opinions on campus (I forget the name and the school).  There was Donglegate where Adria Richards thought it was her domain to get two guys fired, which is only one of the increasing instances of Mozillaing.  And there's more than one instance where some idiot adult child will claim we need to ban conservative talk radio.

This trend, however, is not so scary because of what these people are doing, but because they are unconsciously doing it.  They are unconscious of what they are saying.  And they are unable to fully and thoroughly think through the consequences of advocating such things.  What's worse, however, is the disease is further complicated and entrenched in the minds of young people by a historic amount of brainwashing and pampering.  Be it the trillions of dollars in debt accrued to prevent said people from paying the full price of their socialist utopia, the 20 years of brainwashing they received from K-college, or society and their parents bending over backwards to kiss their asses, all of this shields these kids from the harsh and necessary realities of life.  This not only results in adults who are incapable of supporting themselves, completely clueless about how the real world economy works, but worse it convinces them they are entitled to everything in life.  This lays the ground work for what is arguably the most despicable aspect of this mental condition - victimhood.

From the ever increasing categories of "privilege" to the left's desire to separate and define people by their skin color, an entire generation has been trained to take traits they were born, fool themselves into thinking they are oppressed because of it, and demand other people slave away for them.  This is not only cowardly and hypocritical, but it also attaches an emotional element to the disease where they take personal affront to any attempts of constructive criticism or insistence of self-supportation and production.  In short, it renders the host with this disease immune to any attempts to cure them.

You combine this altogether and what you have is a group of people who:

1.  Are not able to support themselves
2.  Lack the mental ability to understand the sovereignty and freedom of other people and
3.  Therefore lack the ability to protect freedom while voting
4.  Are trained to find insult in everything and view themselves only as a victim
5.  Are not capable of logical and intellectually honest thought
6.  Who are instead ruled by emotions and self-pity
7.  and are therefore uncurable and beyond reason.

Add to that, that generations really never grow up, just get old, and you can see why this sickness is such a threat.

People infected with this disease will act and vote in a way that will destroy the liberty and freedom Western Civilization spent the last 2,500 years trying to build.  You may say, "well, that's why we have the Constitution.  That's why we have the courts" or "that'll never happen."  But what if these people were to become the justices?  What if they were to become the politicians and leaders of this country?  A piece of paper or the foresight of our founding fathers to have the division of powers cannot stop an entire population that is mentally sick and impaired.  And instances such as Brendan Eich and Dartmouth caving to the demands of a sick person, already shows you the lack of US institutions to stop and fight this sickness.

What will "end" this sickness, however, will be an economic collapse wherein there is no more government money to keep these people supported in their current environment.  Life-long college students come professors will no longer have a university to go and teach at.  The various "professional activists" will have to worry about clean water instead of saving the whales. And professional victims will have more pressing matters like starvation than finding fake umbrage at a Cinco De Mayo fundraiser.  Unfortunately, such a collapse can be staved off a long time with the fed's constant printing of money and the US' relative position of being the "least sucky economy" in the world, and this will continue to provide the environment these diseased people thrive in.  Ergo, not only are they not going away, they're going to increase as the 20 somethings of today become the 40 somethings of tomorrow and by default infiltrate our various institutions.

There's not much to do but what we're doing now.  Pointing it out and trying to bring shame to these people.  Alas, their brainwashing is so complete, their sense of victimhood so engrained, and their sense of entitlement so strong, it is doubtful anything will ever get through to these liberal zombies.

Enjoy the decline.

Selective Outrage

Can I ask you something?

If being a racist slumlord is enough to have you stripped of your property and vilified in the press, what the hell is Valerie Jarrett still doing working in the Obama Administration?

Or is it okay if you hate the right ethnic group?

I’ve said before the Obama Administration has made it vogue to publicly hate Jews again. The blatant Anti-Semitism in the Obama Administration isn’t secretly recorded. Rather, it is seen in the clear light of day. And nobody in the Enslaved Press gives a damn.

What bugs me about the feeding frenzy over these racist remarks from some old coot basketball team owner is the selective outrage coming from the media and the usual suspects of the race mongering industry.

Some old codger made racist remarks in private. Who gives a damn?

I sing along to Dusty Springfield when nobody can hear me. It’s none of your damn business. Of course, now you all know.

Have you seen how some NBA players behave in public?!

Good gracious, these guys pull guns on each other, get into fistfights, call people faggots, attack their girlfriends As Ben Shapiro points out on Breitbart, Clippers guard JJ Redick had a “contract” with his girlfriend that if she gets pregnant, she has to have an abortion. Well, she did get pregnant, didn’t want to get an abortion and Reddick forced her to.

Kobe Bryant was accused of raping a girl. He’s still a superstar baller. Um. I mean, player.

How many of these guys beat the living bejesus out of their girlfriends and, at the end of the day, still have their über-high salaries and endorsements?

And don’t even get me started on Dennis Rodman.

What about the millionaire Obama supporter who was arrested for beating the crap out of his girlfriend? This fella, Gurbaksh Chalal savagely beat and kicked his girlfriend for half an hour — all of which was caught on video. The judge threw out the video as evidence and this Obama supporter and frequent guest to the White House received the harsh sentence of community service.

This is the same guy Obama uses as a poster child for Amnesty. Which, kinda says it all, doesn’t it?

You realize if this guy were a Republican donor named Steve Smith and he beat an African-American girlfriend savagely, his life and reputation would be, understandably over. He’d be on his way to prison for a good long time. The story would be the lead item on all network and cable news outfits for weeks. CNN would stop searching for the plane to rake this man over the coals 24-7. Obama, Jesse Jackson, Al “FBI-Informant” Sharpton, Oprah Winfrey, and all the racialists at MSNBC would never shut up about it. Eric Holder would be having the Justice Department investigate whether there is enough to bring Federal Civil Rights charges against him.

But good old Gurbaksh Chalal is getting a slap on the wrist.

The selective outrage makes the Enslaved Press and all the racialist look like what they are — opportunistic race-baiters looking to further divide this nation.

Frankly, the thing about octogenarian Sterling that creeps me out is this girlfriend of his is young enough to be his granddaughter.

This little parasitic gold-digger is going to use ruining this old coot as a means to becoming fabulously wealthy.

I bet Octomom is kicking herself for not thinking of hooking up with the old codger.
The NBA really doesn’t have any right to claim moral high-ground over Sterling. It isn’t like he was a model tolerant, charitable soul for eighty years and suddenly found his inner Democrat Klansman.

He’s always been a son of a bitch.

The difference isn’t Sterling.

The difference is Obama’s America.

Barack Obama is losing popularity like a guy with alopecia loses hair.

The Democrats’ fortunes for 2014 are looking even worse than 2010.
Even Americans who hopped aboard the SS HopenChange are fleeing that sinking ship faster than the rats can.

The only way to maintain momentum in this quiet little coup is to divide and conquer.
They have to keep Americans at each other’s throats. They have to keep the races divided. They have to keep the genders divided. They have to keep class warfare front and center in the President’s ridiculous policy choices.

Sterling is who he apparently has always been.
But his racism can serve a purpose in helping to gain ground in this conquering of America. So the selective outrage cranks into high gear.
Everyone is playing their parts beautifully.

Obama makes a public statement about how we have so far to go still when it comes to race.

Oprah gets on board blathering on about plantations.

Jesse and Al threaten to boycott advertisers.

The NBA responds by banning Sterling for life — even from the team and facilities he himself owns.

And the Enslaved Press keeps the story alive day after day after miserable day.

The “Cliven Bundy is a Big Fat Racist” story didn’t get the legs they were hoping for. Most of that was due to the Enslaved Press not wanting to shine a light on the Bundy Ranch story for fear that the negative reactions to how the Federal Government is behaving might undermine any divisions they could sew.

They needed themselves a fat, juicy “America is as Racist Today as it has Always Been” news item.

And along come the secretly recorded racist remarks of this old coot Sterling.
Even Low Information Voters know what the NBA is.

You think it’s coincidence that this story broke on the tabloid news shows?
“Cliven Bundy is a Big Fat Racist” isn’t TMZ material. What average “Inside Edition” or “Entertainment Tonight” viewer wants to watch some sound bite about some old cowboy who raises cattle?

But an NBA team owner? In Los Angeles?

Now, that’s a story that will capture the Lo-Fo’s attention!

This selective outrage is, like most of the selective outrage has been, manufactured.

This division between the races is so advantageous for the Left that they will never, ever let it go.

Keeping racism alive matters more to Liberals than keeping abortion legal.
The sticky wicket of course is that this man who apparently is as evil as Hitler was about to be honored by the NAACP.

Nothing screams selective outrage quite like that nugget of information.

I’m sure the reason overkill is the menu of the day is because the NAACP needs some cover fire.

Is Sterling a racist asshole?

You betcha! But he was the NBA’s excused racist asshole. And given the thug-like behavior the NBA overlooks on a startlingly regular basis, the selective outrage they are now showing doesn’t make Sterling look bad.

It makes the NBA, the NAACP and the rest of the racialist conga line look like a bunch of fools.